Second Property Investors serves 10,000 readers monthly and helped hundreds of homeowners to upgrade/restructure their property portfolio. Read through our case studies
A unit at Seletar Springs can be bought in the resale market for $800psf.
Some units can also be gotten for as low as $718psf too.
Can Seletar Spring be considered as the “undervalued” property when compared to Rivertree Residences?
Purchasing Seletar Spring at a lower PSF would be the better choice right?
But what was the end result of buying a resale unit at Seletar Springs instead of selecting a new launch back in 2014?
In 2019, 2020, 2021 – there were still Seletar Springs units selling at a loss.
Whereas for Rivertree Residences – there has been no unprofitable transactions till now.
Even for those who bought at the peak prices of 2014 at $11xx psf.
(Take note that for all these transactions – it is exclusive of tax and costs involved. These are purely buying and selling prices.)
Example #3: Alex Residences (New Launch) vs Ascentia Sky (Resale)
These 2 developments are closely located at Redhill MRT.
Ascentia Sky hit TOP in 2013 while Alex Residences was launched in 2014.
You can see that someone brought at unit at Ascentia Sky for $14xx psf in November 2013 and sold in 2021.
And they still lost $85K.
Nowadays, people say that bigger units will perform better than smaller units.
But this Ascentia Sky unit actually lost more money when compared to a 2-bedder unit at Alex Residences that was bought in Dec 2013 and sold in 2021 as well.
That Alex Residences unit that was bought and sold at around the same time of the Ascentia Sky $85K loss-making unit?
It only lost $3K.
$1891psf for Alex Residences and $1343psf for Ascentia Sky.
Both developments are just beside each other. Which one is really “undervalued”?
And yet Ascentia Sky lost more money.
Unbelievable right?
Example #4: Urban Vista (New Launch) vs Optima @ Tanah Merah (Resale)
Let’s look at the development with the most number of unprofitable transactions I ever seen for a new launch.
Urban Vista was completed in 2017.
Optima @ Tanah Merah was completed in 2012.
Personally, I don’t really like Urban Vista due to its poor layout.
I think it is one of the main reasons why it doesn’t really generate profitable transactions for its owners.
So by right, it should perform really poorly for a development that was considered a new launch next to Optima.
Let’s look at the performance between Urban Vista and Optima @ Tanah Merah.
For units bought in 2013 and sold in 2020 and 2021 – the Urban Vista owners made losses from $94k to $216k.
For units bought in 2013 and sold in 2020 and 2021 – the Optima owners made losses from $70k to $288K.
Both are not fantastic.
We might think Urban Vista has a lot more unprofitable transactions.
Which is correct. Urban Vista has more transaction volume.
But for Optima there was only 1 profitable transaction for owner who bought in 2013 and sold in 2023.
This means out of 4 units bought in 2013 for Optima (when it has hit TOP) and have sold their unit by now – 3 of them were unprofitable.
And not forgetting there were many more units bought in 2012 that lost money when sold in 2020 and 2021 too.
The losses can go up as high as $430k.
The Market Can Always Turn Against You
After the peak of 2013, you can see the property price index started to slide downwards.
What happened that caused this downward slide?
There were a few factors:
An extreme form of cooling measure which was the introduction of TDSR in 2013
Increased supply of new launches and properties in the pipeline
Here are some of the news headlines from that period:
The reason I am pulling out all these headlines is because it has happened before.
I was in the market back then.
I’ve seen the struggles before to sell properties when there was very few takers.
Now, when we see the market continue to rise, we feel optimistic.
Sometimes even invincible.
That’s why I am reminding of the need to be cautious.
TDSR brought in significant impact to the property prices that it started a longest losing streak on record back in 2016.
However our memories are short.
We tend to forget the bad times too quickly.
And we have forgotten about the time when it was hard to find buyers for our property.
Conclusion
The resale developments I presented here are usually considered undervalued and in a good location.
When compared to a new launch nearby which was sold at a much higher price, the perception of the resale development is that it is “undervalued”.
You can see that even the worst new launches that I am aware of – they still performed better than the “undervalued” resale development located nearby.
This is something for you to consider to think about:
If you are a buyer who is planning to just go for an “undervalued” property – I urge you to be mindful and think about whether it will still be “undervalued” in the future.
There is a reason why some condo prices remain stagnant for long periods of time.
If you are an owner who is now feeling good about your paper gains – I suggest that you secure those paper gains into actual gains – before the market turns against you.
And if you think your property is not performing – perhaps it is time to consider changing to a better-performing one?
Free up the funds from those underperforming properties and channel it to a better one.
Do it while sentiment is still positive and optimism is high.
As you have seen, cooling measures can come without warning and at midnight.
The market can turn against you.
This is the time to consider whether your success in your property gains was due to luck or skill.
If you have further questions on your own property choices for the future, let’s arrange a no-obligation discussion.
You can drop me a message via WhatsApp or the contact form.
Gary Seah is the founder of Second Property Investors and has been writing since 2015 to share his insights in the Singapore property market.
He has helped many people to strategize, plan & restructure their property portfolio and get the best profit from it.
Gary has been the agent behind many lucrative upgrading case studies.
Learnt something from this post? Help me spread the word!
It usually takes me more than 20 hours to research and write insightful content for each blog post. If you feel you have benefited or learnt something from the above, I sincerely request your help to share this to your friends or family members via WhatsApp – so they can also benefit.
Who knows – they may have been looking for an answer all this while?
The sharing buttons are below:
I have seen you are doing great market researched. I really happy with your informative content. But I want to more valuable content form you regarding this year if possible to share as soon as possible. I think you have enough knowledge regarding Property analysist.
\n \n ${window.location.hostname} currently does not have any sponsors for you.\n \n `,e)}imprint(e){if(!e)return;const t=document.querySelector("#imprint-text");t&&(t.innerHTML=e.replace(/(?:\r\n|\r|\n)/g," "))}injectStyles(e){if(!e)return;const t=document.createElement("style");t.innerHTML=e.toString(),document.head.appendChild(t)}injectScript(e){if(!e)return;const t=document.createElement("script");t.type="text/javascript",t.src=e,document.body.appendChild(t)}injectJS(js){js&&0!==js.length&&eval(js)}injectHTML(e){this.domNode?(e&&(this.domNode.innerHTML=e),this.domIsReady=!0):(this.domIsReady=!1,console.error("An error occurred when trying to render this page. DOM node not found."))}prerender(e){this.injectMetaDescription(e.domain),this.injectHTML(e.html)}template(e){var t;this.domIsReady||this.prerender(e),this.injectStyles(e.stylesheet),this.imprint(e.imprint),this.salesBanner(e.salesBanner),this.injectJS(e.javascript),null===(t=e.scripts)||void 0===t||t.forEach((e=>{this.injectScript(e)}))}}const Render=new Renderer(APP_TARGET);var Type;!function(e){e[e.Failed=0]="Failed",e[e.Disabled=1]="Disabled",e[e.Redirect=2]="Redirect",e[e.Parking=3]="Parking",e[e.Sales=4]="Sales"}(Type||(Type={}));let State$2=class{get trackingType(){return this._trackingType}set trackingType(e){this._trackingType=e}get track(){return!!this.trackingType}};class Disabled extends State$2{constructor(){super(...arguments),this.type=Type.Disabled}static build(e,t){let n;switch(t===Blocking.BLOCKED&&(n="adblocker"),e.cannotPark){case"disabled_mr":case"disabled_rc":n=e.cannotPark}if(n){const t=new Disabled;return t.reason=n,t.domain=e.domainName,t}}get message(){switch(this.reason){case"adblocker":return"
Content blocked
Please turn off your ad blocker.";case"disabled_mr":return`
Invalid URL
Referral traffic for ${this.domain} does not meet requirements.`;default:return`
No sponsors
${this.domain} currently does not have any sponsors for you.`}}get trackingType(){switch(this.reason){case"adblocker":return"ad_blocked_message";case"disabled_mr":return"invalid_referral";case"disabled_rc":return"revenue_cap_reached";default:return"no_sponsors_message"}}toContext(){return{cannotPark:this.reason}}}class Failed extends State$2{constructor(){super(...arguments),this.type=Type.Failed}static cannotPark({cannotPark:e}){switch(e){case"disabled_b":case"prohibited_ua":case"disabled_fr":case"revenue_cap_reached":case"disabled_mr":case"disabled_rc":case"disabled_cp":case"invalid_domain":{const t=new Failed;return t.reason=e,t}}}static noSponsors({cannotLoadAds:e}){if(e){const e=new Failed;return e.reason="no_sponsors",e}}static fromError(e){const t=new Failed;return t.reason="js_error",t.error=e,t}get track(){return!!this.trackingType}get message(){switch(this.reason){case"disabled_fr":case"disabled_rc":case"no_sponsors":return`\n
No Sponsors
\n
${this.domain} currently does not have any sponsors for you.
`;case"disabled_mr":return`\n
Invalid URL
\n
Referral traffic for ${this.domain} does not meet requirements.
`;case"js_error":return"\n
An Error Occurred
\n
Parking is currently unavailable. We'll be right back.
1 Comment
Kelvin Neo says
I have seen you are doing great market researched. I really happy with your informative content. But I want to more valuable content form you regarding this year if possible to share as soon as possible. I think you have enough knowledge regarding Property analysist.